Skip to content

Company intelligence

Beyond the price.
Inside the business.

Explore this page

BKNG — Booking Holdings Inc.

NASDAQ · Financials · Large Cap · Mkt cap $122.3B · Vol 5.14M

$162.78

▲ +4.41% today

Live · market · updated 7:56:23 PM

Day $160.99–$166.02 · 52w $150.14–$225.00

Research Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) using available valuation, profitability and leverage data. Check each figure's source and compare reporting periods before drawing conclusions. Missing provider data must not be treated as a reported company fact.

About Booking Holdings Inc.

Listed company
Booking Holdings Inc.
Exchange and ticker
NASDAQ stock directory · BKNG
Provider sector
Consumer Cyclical
Provider industry
Travel Services

Booking Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides online and traditional travel and restaurant reservations and related services in the United States, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company operates Booking.com, which offers online accommodation reservations; and Priceline, which provides discount travel reservations services, as well as online accommodation, flight, rental car reservation services, vacation packages, cruises, activity, and affiliate programs. It also operates Agoda that offers online accommodation reservation, flight, ground transportation, and attractions. In addition, the company operates KAYAK, an online meta-search service that allows consumers to search and compare travel itineraries and prices; and OpenTable for booking online restaurant reservations, as well as reservation management services to restaurants. Further, it offers travel-related insurance products, payment facilitation, and restaurant management services to consumers, travel service providers, and restaurants; and advertising services. The company was formerly known as The Priceline Group Inc. and changed its name to Booking Holdings Inc. in February 2018. Booking Holdings Inc. was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut.

Source: Yahoo Finance — Booking Holdings Inc. company profileCompany website

Financial statements and reporting periods

Available ratios are snapshots. This page does not provide a complete historical quarterly-results, profit-and-loss, balance-sheet or shareholding series. Use company filings to verify reporting periods, accounting changes and trends.

🏛️ Member of:S&P SmallCap 600Russell 2000

DeepScreen verdict

Strong Buy
81
81

Weighted 13-factor score / 100

Booking Holdings Inc. scores 81/100 on the DeepScreen quality-and-value model. Growth is running near 8.1% with a PEG of 0.89, ROCE of 26.5% and debt/equity at 0.2x. Valuation and capital efficiency line up favourably against sector norms.

Strengths

  • + ROE and ROCE both above 15% (16.5% / 26.5%) — genuine capital efficiency, not just debt-flattered equity returns.
  • + ROA: 20.4% — assets working hard
  • + Debt / Equity: 0.20x — conservative balance sheet
  • + LT Debt / Equity: 0.17x — very low structural debt

Risks

  • − EV/Revenue: 4.45x — moderate
  • − Operating Leverage: 1.44x — low fixed-cost gearing
  • − ROE: 16.5% — healthy

Vision & Utility score and Secret Tips badges is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Target price, trim level & stop-loss is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Why this score?

The 81/100 score is a weighted average of 13 fundamental factors. This panel shows which factor scores contribute most to the current model result.

Model explanation

Highest-scoring factors

ROA100/100 · 0.9× weight

Assets working hard. Weighted contribution: 7.0 points.

Debt / Equity100/100 · 1.1× weight

Conservative balance sheet. Weighted contribution: 8.6 points.

LT Debt / Equity100/100 · 0.8× weight

Very low structural debt. Weighted contribution: 6.3 points.

PEG Ratio96/100 · 1.6× weight

Undervalued vs. growth. Weighted contribution: 12.0 points.

Lowest-scoring factors

EV/Revenue34/100 · 0.8× weight

Moderate. Weighted contribution: 2.1 points.

Operating Leverage48/100 · 0.6× weight

Low fixed-cost gearing. Weighted contribution: 2.3 points.

ROE49/100 · 1.3× weight

Healthy. Weighted contribution: 5.0 points.

P/S Ratio71/100 · 0.7× weight

Moderate. Weighted contribution: 3.9 points.

Factor scores are model outputs, not forecasts. A high or low factor score describes how that metric is treated by the DeepScreen rules; review the underlying value and its source before drawing a broader conclusion.

Live fundamentals snapshot

Current operating, capital-efficiency and cash-flow metrics using the latest available provider data.

Live where available
Updated 7:56:23 PM
Revenue growthLive
8.1%

Provider-reported period-over-period growth

Earnings growthLive
130.0%

Provider-reported period-over-period growth

ROEModeled
16.5%

Return on equity

ROCEModeled
26.5%

Return on capital employed

Net marginLive
25.5%

Net income as a share of revenue

D/EModeled
0.2x

Debt relative to shareholder equity

Free cash flowLive
$7.73B

78% of operating cash flow

Cash vs debtLive
$3.71B net debt

Cash $17.21B · Debt $20.92B

Earnings growth is 121.9 percentage points above revenue growth in the latest provider snapshot.

Provider periods can differ by field. Growth figures are presented as reported by the upstream provider; they are not reconstructed from an expensive historical time series.

Current research alerts

Threshold-based research checks from the latest available fundamentals. These are on-page signals, not push notifications or predictions.

No threshold-based research flag

ROE and ROCE both above 15% (16.5% / 26.5%) — genuine capital efficiency, not just debt-flattered equity returns.

Signals are intended to highlight questions for research, not replace company filings or independent review.

Closest peer competitors

Industry match: Travel Services. Peers use the same regional market universe, same sector, provider-reported industry where available, and market-cap proximity.

Loading

Peer fundamentals are still loading. The comparison will populate automatically when comparable company data arrives.

DeepScreen Secret Tips, traps & X-Ray analysis is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

God's Eye forensics

Accounting quality and solvency screens. Anything that can't be computed from available filings data is left blank rather than estimated.

Piotroski F-Score

7/8

7

7 of 8 financial-health checks passed (1 checks need data this provider doesn't publish).

Altman Z-Score

Insufficient data

—

Needs total assets, operating profit and debt — not published for this listing yet.

Beneish (earnings quality)

Low distortion risk

1.37

Accrual-quality check only: operating cash flow is 137% of reported net profit. Below 80% means profits aren't fully backed by cash.

Scores are free. The criteria-by-criteria breakdown — exactly which checks this company failed — is part of DeepScreen Pro.

Fundamental breakdown — core ratios are free · EV/Revenue, PEG, EV/EBITDA and LT D/E are Pro-only live via Yahoo Finance, updated 7:56:23 PM

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Live

18.1x

Fairly priced

Price divided by earnings per share: how much you pay today for ₹1/$1 of annual profit. Only compare within the same industry.

PEG Ratio

Live

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

P/S Ratio

Live

4.33x

Moderate

Price relative to revenue. Sales are much harder to accounting-fudge than earnings, so this is a trustworthy number — and it's often the only usable multiple for loss-making or early-stage companies where P/E doesn't exist. But revenue without margin means nothing on its own: always read it alongside net margin.

P/B Ratio

Modeled

2.98x

Reasonable

Price versus net asset value on the balance sheet. Most meaningful for banks, NBFCs and asset-heavy businesses (manufacturing, real estate) where book value closely tracks real worth.

EV/Revenue

Live

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

EV/EBITDA

Live

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

ROE

Modeled

16.5%

Healthy

Return on shareholder equity. High ROE is great — unless it is manufactured by heavy debt, so always read it next to ROA and D/E: high ROE with low ROA is the classic debt-trap pattern.

ROA

Live

20.4%

Assets working hard

Net Income / Total Assets — how efficiently the whole business converts its asset base into profit. Computed as ROE / (1 + D/E) when live data is unavailable. Only compare within the same industry: asset-light businesses (IT, services) will always show a structurally higher ROA than asset-heavy ones (steel, airlines, utilities) simply because they carry far less on the balance sheet to begin with, not because they're better run.

ROCE

Modeled

26.5%

High-quality compounder

Return on all capital employed (equity plus debt). The cleanest quality signal because debt cannot flatter it.

Debt / Equity

Modeled

0.20x

Conservative balance sheet

Total liabilities divided by shareholders' equity — the broadest leverage measure. High leverage boosts ROE in good years and destroys it in bad ones.

LT Debt / Equity

Modeled

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

Payout Ratio

Live

18%

Growth company — reinvesting most profit

Share of profit paid out as dividend. Above 100% means the company is funding the dividend from debt or reserves, not profit — a genuine red flag, not just 'high'. 30–60% is the classic sustainable balance; well below that usually just means a growth company reinvesting rather than anything wrong.

Operating Leverage

Modeled

1.44x

Low fixed-cost gearing

How much profit jumps for each 1% of extra sales — driven by how much of the cost base is fixed (rent, salaries) versus variable (raw materials). It's a double-edged sword: high fixed-cost businesses (manufacturing, airlines, software) see profit jump disproportionately as sales grow, but the same fixed costs turn a small sales dip into an outsized loss. That's also why these businesses tend to lead in a bull market and get hit hardest first when demand turns down.

DCF & Graham intrinsic value calculators is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Company financials

EPS (TTM)
$9.01
Revenue (TTM)
$28.2B
Net margin
25.53%
EBITDA margin
36.87%
Earnings growth
8.1%
Dividend yield
0.01%
Payout ratio
17.86%
Debt / equity
0.2x

Figures use live Yahoo Finance data where available; any field Yahoo doesn't report falls back to the DeepScreen model.

BKNG live news

LIVE

Loading live headlines…

Frequently asked questions about BKNG

How does DeepScreen analyze Booking Holdings Inc.?
DeepScreen uses a 13-factor valuation and quality model. The methodology explains the inputs, weighting and limitations; model output is analytical research, not a personalized investment recommendation.
What is BKNG's P/E ratio?
The latest provider-backed P/E available to DeepScreen is 18.1x. Compare it with the company's own historical range, sustainable earnings growth and close industry peers, using the same reporting period.
How should I assess Booking Holdings Inc.'s profitability?
For Booking Holdings Inc., the latest provider-backed snapshot shows the latest growth measure is 8.10%, net margin is 25.53%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.
How much debt does Booking Holdings Inc. have?
The current structured company profile does not contain a reliable company-specific debt-to-equity figure. The correct source for that fact is the latest annual report, exchange filing and official company disclosure; DeepScreen should not manufacture a number.
Is BKNG a buy?
DeepScreen provides research tools rather than a personalized recommendation. A decision should consider business quality, valuation, balance-sheet risk, disclosures, liquidity and your own objectives and risk tolerance.
How does the company make money?
Booking Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides online and traditional travel and restaurant reservations and related services in the United States, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company operates Booking.com, which offers online accommodation reservations; and Priceline, which provides discount travel reservations services, as well as online accommodation, flight, rental car reservation services, vacation packages, cruises, activity, and affiliate programs. It also operates Agoda that offers online accommodation reservation, flight, ground transportation, and attractions. In addition, the company operates KAYAK, an online meta-search service that allows consumers to search and compare travel itineraries and prices; and OpenTable for booking online restaurant reservations, as well as reservation management services to restaurants. Further, it offers travel-related insurance products, payment facilitation, and restaurant management services to consumers, travel service providers, and restaurants; and advertising services. The company was formerly known as The Priceline Group Inc. and changed its name to Booking Holdings Inc. in February 2018. Booking Holdings Inc. was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut. This describes the company's disclosed business activity; for exact segment revenue, geography and customer concentration, use the latest annual report.
What is the company's competitive advantage (economic moat)?
Booking Holdings Inc.'s potential moat should be evaluated from observable business economics: scale or cost advantages, network effects, switching costs, brand strength, patents or licences, distribution advantages and barriers to entry. The strongest evidence is a durable combination of pricing power, stable/growing margins and returns on capital over many years; a high ROE or ROCE alone does not prove a moat.
Who are the main competitors, and how does the company differ from them?
DeepScreen's directory-based comparison candidates include PGP (Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund Common Shares of Beneficial Interest), RAMP (LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.), NIC (Nicolet Bankshares Inc.), ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund Common Shares), WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation). Sector labels and market-cap proximity can use inferred or modeled directory inputs; these candidates are not a verified list of direct competitors; the direct comparison should use products, customers, geography, margins, growth, returns on capital and valuation.
Are its products or services in long-term demand?
The provider classifies Booking Holdings Inc. in Travel Services. Long-term demand is supported when the underlying industry, customer base and product/service use remain durable over multiple years. For Booking Holdings Inc., test that through multi-year revenue and customer trends, retention/repeat purchases where applicable, pricing power, capacity utilisation and the risk of substitution or technological disruption.
Who are its primary customers (individuals, businesses, or government)?
The provider's business profile describes Booking Holdings Inc.'s activities as follows: Booking Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides online and traditional travel and restaurant reservations and related services in the United States, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company operates Booking.com, which offers online accommodation reservations; and Priceline, which provides discount travel reservations services, as well as online accommodation, flight, rental car reservation services, vacation packages, cruises, activity, and affiliate programs. It also operates Agoda that offers online accommodation reservation, flight, ground transportation, and attractions. In addition, the company operates KAYAK, an online meta-search service that allows consumers to search and compare travel itineraries and prices; and OpenTable for booking online restaurant reservations, as well as reservation management services to restaurants. Further, it offers travel-related insurance products, payment facilitation, and restaurant management services to consumers, travel service providers, and restaurants; and advertising services. The company was formerly known as The Priceline Group Inc. and changed its name to Booking Holdings Inc. in February 2018. Booking Holdings Inc. was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut. Customer mix itself is not a stock-market ratio, so the primary customers should be confirmed from the company's segment, geographic and customer disclosures.
Is the company consistently profitable, and is its revenue growing year-over-year?
For Booking Holdings Inc., the latest provider-backed snapshot shows the latest growth measure is 8.10%, net margin is 25.53%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.
Does the company generate positive, healthy free cash flow?
The latest provider snapshot reports free cash flow of approximately $7.73B, with operating cash flow of about $9.86B. Whether that cash flow is healthy depends on persistence, conversion of profit to cash, capital expenditure needs and working-capital movements; inspect multiple periods rather than one TTM figure.
How high are the company's debt levels compared to its cash holdings and earnings?
The current snapshot shows a partial leverage picture, debt of roughly $20.92B, cash of roughly $17.21B, implying net debt of about $3.71B. The full debt burden should be compared with EBITDA/EBIT, interest expense, maturities and recurring free cash flow.
How will the company finance its future growth or expansion projects?
Booking Holdings Inc. currently has reported cash of about $17.21B and free cash flow of about $7.73B. Those internal resources can contribute to expansion, while additional funding can come from operating cash flow, debt, equity issuance, asset sales or project finance. The exact funding mix for a specific project must come from management's disclosed plans.
What is the company's historical Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)?
Historical ROE and ROCE should be taken from several annual reporting periods. The key question is whether returns remain durable rather than whether one year's ratio is high.
Who are the promoters or top executives running the company, and what is their track record?
The current provider profile lists these senior executives: Mr. Glenn D. Fogel (President, CEO & Director); Mr. Ewout Lucien Steenbergen (Executive VP & CFO); Mr. Peter J. Millones Jr. (Executive VP & General Counsel); Mr. Paulo Pisano (Chief Human Resources Officer); Ms. Caroline Dolores Sullivan (Senior VP, Chief Accounting Officer & Controller). Track record should be assessed through capital-allocation decisions, operating results, governance disclosures and execution against stated targets. For Indian companies, promoter identity and ownership should be checked against the latest exchange shareholding filing.
Is a high percentage of the promoter's stake pledged as collateral for loans?
Promoter pledge is a shareholding-disclosure item, not a normal valuation ratio. For an Indian company, check the latest exchange shareholding pattern and notes for pledged/encumbered promoter shares, and compare the percentage with prior quarters to identify changes. Do not infer pledge levels from debt-to-equity.
Does management have a transparent and honest history of communication with shareholders?
The strongest evidence is consistency between what management says and what later appears in reported results: guidance versus delivery, explanations for misses, treatment of related parties, restatements, capital allocation and disclosure of material risks. A multi-year record is needed; tone alone is not a reliable measure of transparency.
Has the firm ever faced corporate governance issues, legal troubles, or accounting scandals?
This question requires a dated event history. Review regulator orders, exchange notices, audited-report qualifications, court records and reputable reporting, and distinguish allegations or investigations from settlements and established findings. The absence of a warning label on a stock page is not proof that no historical event ever occurred.
Is the current stock valuation (such as the P/E or P/S ratio) reasonable or overpriced?
The latest provider-backed P/E is 18.1x and P/S is 4.33x . These are descriptive multiples, not conclusions by themselves. A defensible valuation assessment compares the multiple with sustainable growth, margins, ROE/ROCE, balance-sheet risk, cyclicality and direct peers.
How does the company's valuation compare to its direct industry peers?
A practical peer set for Booking Holdings Inc. starts with PGP (Pimco Global StocksPlus & Income Fund Common Shares of Beneficial Interest), RAMP (LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.), NIC (Nicolet Bankshares Inc.), ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund Common Shares), WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation). Compare the same reporting-period P/E, P/S and positive EV/EBITDA only when EBITDA supports a meaningful multiple, then adjust for growth, margin quality, leverage and business mix; a lower positive multiple is not automatically cheaper on an economic-value basis.
What is the margin of safety if market conditions or the economy worsens?
Margin of safety is created by buying with a gap between conservative intrinsic value and market price, then stress-testing the downside case. The relevant stress tests are lower revenue/earnings growth, lower margins, higher funding costs, weaker working capital and a lower terminal valuation. There is no universal fixed percentage that applies to every company.
Does the company pay a reliable dividend, or does it aggressively buy back its own shares?
The latest provider-backed dividend yield is 0.0% and payout ratio is 17.86% . Dividend reliability should be checked across several years and against free cash flow, while buyback intensity should be verified from share-count changes, treasury-share activity and cash-flow statements. A one-year yield cannot establish a durable shareholder-distribution policy.

Stock research topics

Stocks, prices & forecasts

Review the scoring factors, underlying data and limitations before comparing companies.

Read the methodology