How does DeepScreen analyze Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust?

DeepScreen uses a 13-factor valuation and quality model. The methodology explains the inputs, weighting and limitations; model output is analytical research, not a personalized investment recommendation.

What is USA's P/E ratio?

The latest provider-backed P/E available to DeepScreen is 4.7x. Compare it with the company's own historical range, sustainable earnings growth and close industry peers, using the same reporting period.

How should I assess Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust's profitability?

For Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust, the latest provider-backed snapshot shows net margin is 0.00%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.

How much debt does Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust have?

The current structured company profile does not contain a reliable company-specific debt-to-equity figure. The correct source for that fact is the latest annual report, exchange filing and official company disclosure; DeepScreen should not manufacture a number.

DeepScreen provides research tools rather than a personalized recommendation. A decision should consider business quality, valuation, balance-sheet risk, disclosures, liquidity and your own objectives and risk tolerance.

What is the company's competitive advantage (economic moat)?

Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust's potential moat should be evaluated from observable business economics: scale or cost advantages, network effects, switching costs, brand strength, patents or licences, distribution advantages and barriers to entry. The strongest evidence is a durable combination of pricing power, stable/growing margins and returns on capital over many years; a high ROE or ROCE alone does not prove a moat.

Who are the main competitors, and how does the company differ from them?

DeepScreen's directory-based comparison candidates include SYNC (Syncona), VSVS (Vesuvius), CWR (Ceres Power), HLMA (Halma plc), CYPC (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.). Sector labels and market-cap proximity can use inferred or modeled directory inputs; these candidates are not a verified list of direct competitors; the direct comparison should use products, customers, geography, margins, growth, returns on capital and valuation.

Are its products or services in long-term demand?

The provider classifies Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust in Asset Management. Long-term demand is supported when the underlying industry, customer base and product/service use remain durable over multiple years. For Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust, test that through multi-year revenue and customer trends, retention/repeat purchases where applicable, pricing power, capacity utilisation and the risk of substitution or technological disruption.

Is the company consistently profitable, and is its revenue growing year-over-year?

For Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust, the latest provider-backed snapshot shows net margin is 0.00%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.

Does the company generate positive, healthy free cash flow?

Free cash flow should be assessed as operating cash flow minus capital expenditure and then tested for consistency across several periods. A positive single-period result is not enough to establish healthy cash generation.

How high are the company's debt levels compared to its cash holdings and earnings?

Compare gross debt and cash first, then assess net debt relative to EBITDA/EBIT and interest coverage. This separates a highly leveraged balance sheet from a business that carries debt comfortably because cash generation is strong.

How will the company finance its future growth or expansion projects?

The normal financing options are internally generated cash, existing cash reserves, new debt, equity issuance, asset sales or project finance. The exact mix for a future project should be taken from management's announced capital-allocation and funding plans.

What is the company's historical Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)?

Historical ROE and ROCE should be taken from several annual reporting periods. The key question is whether returns remain durable rather than whether one year's ratio is high.

Who are the promoters or top executives running the company, and what is their track record?

The current provider profile lists these senior executives: Mr. Gary Thomas Robinson C.F.A. (Portfolio Manager); Ms. Helen Xiong (Deputy Portfolio Manager). Track record should be assessed through capital-allocation decisions, operating results, governance disclosures and execution against stated targets. For Indian companies, promoter identity and ownership should be checked against the latest exchange shareholding filing.

Is a high percentage of the promoter's stake pledged as collateral for loans?

Promoter pledge is a shareholding-disclosure item, not a normal valuation ratio. For an Indian company, check the latest exchange shareholding pattern and notes for pledged/encumbered promoter shares, and compare the percentage with prior quarters to identify changes. Do not infer pledge levels from debt-to-equity.

Does management have a transparent and honest history of communication with shareholders?

The strongest evidence is consistency between what management says and what later appears in reported results: guidance versus delivery, explanations for misses, treatment of related parties, restatements, capital allocation and disclosure of material risks. A multi-year record is needed; tone alone is not a reliable measure of transparency.

Has the firm ever faced corporate governance issues, legal troubles, or accounting scandals?

This question requires a dated event history. Review regulator orders, exchange notices, audited-report qualifications, court records and reputable reporting, and distinguish allegations or investigations from settlements and established findings. The absence of a warning label on a stock page is not proof that no historical event ever occurred.

Is the current stock valuation (such as the P/E or P/S ratio) reasonable or overpriced?

The latest provider-backed P/E is 4.7x and P/S is not currently available . These are descriptive multiples, not conclusions by themselves. A defensible valuation assessment compares the multiple with sustainable growth, margins, ROE/ROCE, balance-sheet risk, cyclicality and direct peers.

How does the company's valuation compare to its direct industry peers?

A practical peer set for Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust starts with SYNC (Syncona), VSVS (Vesuvius), CWR (Ceres Power), HLMA (Halma plc), CYPC (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.). Compare the same reporting-period P/E, P/S and positive EV/EBITDA only when EBITDA supports a meaningful multiple, then adjust for growth, margin quality, leverage and business mix; a lower positive multiple is not automatically cheaper on an economic-value basis.

What is the margin of safety if market conditions or the economy worsens?

Margin of safety is created by buying with a gap between conservative intrinsic value and market price, then stress-testing the downside case. The relevant stress tests are lower revenue/earnings growth, lower margins, higher funding costs, weaker working capital and a lower terminal valuation. There is no universal fixed percentage that applies to every company.

Does the company pay a reliable dividend, or does it aggressively buy back its own shares?

The current provider-backed dividend yield is not available and payout ratio is 0.00% . Dividend reliability should be checked across several years and against free cash flow, while buyback intensity should be verified from share-count changes, treasury-share activity and cash-flow statements. A one-year yield cannot establish a durable shareholder-distribution policy.

USA — Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust

LSE · Utilities · Mid Cap · Mkt cap £1.1B · Vol 2.61M

£3.83

▲ +1.32% today

Live · market · updated 7:59:41 PM

Day £3.77–£3.83 · 52w £2.61–£3.86

Research Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust (LSE: USA) using available valuation, profitability and leverage data. Check each figure's source and compare reporting periods before drawing conclusions. Missing provider data must not be treated as a reported company fact.

About Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust

Listed company: Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust
Exchange and ticker: LSE stock directory · USA
Provider sector: Financial Services
Provider industry: Asset Management

Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust PLC is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by Baillie Gifford & Co Ltd. The fund is managed by Baillie Gifford & Co. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund seeks to invest in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth stocks of companies across diversified market capitalizations. The fund employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust PLC is domiciled in the United Kingdom.

Source: Yahoo Finance — Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust company profileCompany website

Financial statements and reporting periods

Available ratios are snapshots. This page does not provide a complete historical quarterly-results, profit-and-loss, balance-sheet or shareholding series. Use company filings to verify reporting periods, accounting changes and trends.

How to read operating and free cash flow Balance-sheet and debt checklist

🏛️ Member of:FTSE 250FTSE 350

DeepScreen verdict

Hold

Weighted 13-factor score / 100

Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust scores 60/100 on the DeepScreen quality-and-value model. Growth is running near 5% with a PEG of 0.93, ROCE of 6.1% and debt/equity at 0.98x. Quality and price roughly offset each other; wait for a better entry or clearer growth.

Strengths

+ P/E Ratio (TTM): 4.7x — cheap vs. earnings
+ P/S Ratio: 0.00x — modest sales multiple
+ P/B Ratio: 0.48x — below book value
+ PEG Ratio: 0.93 — undervalued vs. growth

Risks

− ROCE: 6.1% — below cost of capital risk
− ROA: 5.2% — adequate
− ROE: 10.3% — weak

Vision & Utility score and Secret Tips badges is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Holding period & sell alert

Hold — no action today

Suggested holding period

1.1–2.0 years

Core multi-year holding

Target price

£4.46

Trim above £4.21

Stop loss

£3.29

Exit level if the thesis breaks

News bias (live)

-0.20

Next review 2026-12-30

Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust scores 60/100 (Hold). With ROCE at 6.1%, growth near 5% and debt/equity at 0.98x, the model suggests a core multi-year holding of roughly 1.1–2.0 years. Current news bias is negative (-0.2). Nothing in the fundamentals or today's headlines calls for action; let the thesis play out.

Sell triggers to watch

− Price closes below the 3.29 stop level
− ROCE falls under 8% for two straight quarters
− Debt/equity rises above 1.38x
− Earnings growth slips below 3%
− PEG expands past 2.00 without a growth upgrade
− Price runs above 4.46 ahead of the fundamentals

Target price, trim level & stop-loss is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Why this score?

The 60/100 score is a weighted average of 13 fundamental factors. This panel shows which factor scores contribute most to the current model result.

Model explanation

Highest-scoring factors

P/E Ratio (TTM)100/100 · 1.0× weight

Cheap vs. earnings. Weighted contribution: 7.8 points.

P/S Ratio100/100 · 0.7× weight

Modest sales multiple. Weighted contribution: 5.5 points.

P/B Ratio100/100 · 0.7× weight

Below book value. Weighted contribution: 5.5 points.

PEG Ratio94/100 · 1.6× weight

Undervalued vs. growth. Weighted contribution: 11.8 points.

Lowest-scoring factors

ROCE5/100 · 1.6× weight

Below cost of capital risk. Weighted contribution: 0.6 points.

ROA24/100 · 0.9× weight

Adequate. Weighted contribution: 1.7 points.

ROE25/100 · 1.3× weight

Weak. Weighted contribution: 2.5 points.

EV/EBITDA40/100 · 1.2× weight

Not meaningful — EBITDA or enterprise value does not support a positive multiple. Weighted contribution: 3.8 points.

Factor scores are model outputs, not forecasts. A high or low factor score describes how that metric is treated by the DeepScreen rules; review the underlying value and its source before drawing a broader conclusion.

Live fundamentals snapshot

Current operating, capital-efficiency and cash-flow metrics using the latest available provider data.

Live where available

Updated 7:59:41 PM

Revenue growthModeled

Unavailable

Provider-reported period-over-period growth

Earnings growthModeled

Unavailable

Provider-reported period-over-period growth

ROEModeled

10.3%

Return on equity

ROCEModeled

6.1%

Return on capital employed

Net marginLive

0.0%

Net income as a share of revenue

D/EModeled

1.0x

Debt relative to shareholder equity

Free cash flowModeled

Unavailable

Latest provider figure

Cash vs debtModeled

Unavailable

Latest provider figures

Provider periods can differ by field. Growth figures are presented as reported by the upstream provider; they are not reconstructed from an expensive historical time series.

Current research alerts

Threshold-based research checks from the latest available fundamentals. These are on-page signals, not push notifications or predictions.

No threshold-based research flag

P/E Ratio (TTM): 4.7x — cheap vs. earnings

Signals are intended to highlight questions for research, not replace company filings or independent review.

Closest peer competitors

Industry match: Asset Management. Peers use the same regional market universe, same sector, provider-reported industry where available, and market-cap proximity.

Peer fundamentals are still loading. The comparison will populate automatically when comparable company data arrives.

DeepScreen Secret Tips

Sector Relative · REITs / Infrastructure

X-Ray classification engine: five forensic states, sector-aware overlays and ratio-level theses. Hover any badge for the plain-English reasoning.

🪤 Value Trap

ℹ️ Sector Relative: P/E and EPS payout are suppressed; review Price/FFO and FFO/AFFO payout where available.

ℹ️ Data-source note: IFRS, lease treatment and reporting definitions can distort direct comparisons with GAAP-based markets.

ℹ️ Executive-compensation test: the current provider exposes officer names/titles but not bonus formulas, EPS hurdles or ROIC hurdles, so no incentive trap is inferred.

Profitability

3 signals

ROE

10.3%

🪤 Value Trap

ROE 10.3% is below the quality threshold; compare the multi-year trend before calling it structural.

ROCE

6.1%

🚩 Value Destroyer

🚩 ROCE 6.1% is below the 10% hurdle on the available data.

ROA

5.2%

🪤 Value Trap

ROA 5.2% should be read with margin and asset-turnover trends.

Valuation

6 signals

P/E (ignored)

N/A

ℹ️ Sector Relative

Sector Relative

Sector Relative: use Price/FFO when available; P/E is not the preferred REIT/infrastructure valuation measure.

P/S

0.00x

🪤 Value Trap

🪤 Low P/S with no margin support: cheap revenue is not the same as profitable revenue.

P/B

0.48x

🌱 Future Growth Story

P/B 0.48x is most useful alongside stable ROE.

EV/Revenue

1.38x

✅ Quality Compounder

EV/Revenue 1.38x should be read against the sector band and revenue trajectory.

EV/EBITDA

N/M

ℹ️ Sector Relative

EV/EBITDA is not meaningful here because the multiple is non-positive. Negative values are not a cheap valuation signal; review enterprise value, EBITDA and free cash flow separately.

PEG

0.93x

🌱 Future Growth Story

PEG 0.93x should be checked against multi-year growth, not one period.

Solvency

1 signals

Debt / Equity

0.98x

⚠️ Financial Engineering / Fragile

D/E is most useful alongside interest coverage and ROCE.

Capital Allocation

2 signals

Payout Ratio

🌱 Future Growth Story

Sector Relative

Sector Relative: verify dividend safety using FFO/AFFO payout instead of EPS payout.

Operating Leverage

2.65x

🌱 Future Growth Story

Operating leverage can amplify both growth and decline.

DeepScreen Secret Tips, traps & X-Ray analysis is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

God's Eye forensics

Accounting quality and solvency screens. Anything that can't be computed from available filings data is left blank rather than estimated.

Piotroski F-Score

4/5

4 of 5 financial-health checks passed (4 checks need data this provider doesn't publish).

Altman Z-Score

Insufficient data

—

Needs total assets, operating profit and debt — not published for this listing yet.

Beneish (earnings quality)

Insufficient data

—

The full manipulation model needs two years of receivables, depreciation and accrual data, which isn't published for this listing.

Scores are free. The criteria-by-criteria breakdown — exactly which checks this company failed — is part of DeepScreen Pro.

Fundamental breakdown — core ratios are free · EV/Revenue, PEG, EV/EBITDA and LT D/E are Pro-only live via Yahoo Finance, updated 7:59:41 PM

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Live

4.7x

Cheap vs. earnings

Price divided by earnings per share: how much you pay today for ₹1/$1 of annual profit. Only compare within the same industry.

PEG Ratio

Modeled

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

P/S Ratio

Modeled

0.00x

Modest sales multiple

Price relative to revenue. Sales are much harder to accounting-fudge than earnings, so this is a trustworthy number — and it's often the only usable multiple for loss-making or early-stage companies where P/E doesn't exist. But revenue without margin means nothing on its own: always read it alongside net margin.

P/B Ratio

Modeled

0.48x

Below book value

Price versus net asset value on the balance sheet. Most meaningful for banks, NBFCs and asset-heavy businesses (manufacturing, real estate) where book value closely tracks real worth.

EV/Revenue

Modeled

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

EV/EBITDA

Live

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

ROE

Modeled

10.3%

Weak

Return on shareholder equity. High ROE is great — unless it is manufactured by heavy debt, so always read it next to ROA and D/E: high ROE with low ROA is the classic debt-trap pattern.

ROA

Modeled

5.2%

Adequate

Net Income / Total Assets — how efficiently the whole business converts its asset base into profit. Computed as ROE / (1 + D/E) when live data is unavailable. Only compare within the same industry: asset-light businesses (IT, services) will always show a structurally higher ROA than asset-heavy ones (steel, airlines, utilities) simply because they carry far less on the balance sheet to begin with, not because they're better run.

ROCE

Modeled

6.1%

Below cost of capital risk

Return on all capital employed (equity plus debt). The cleanest quality signal because debt cannot flatter it.

Debt / Equity

Modeled

0.98x

Manageable

Total liabilities divided by shareholders' equity — the broadest leverage measure. High leverage boosts ROE in good years and destroys it in bad ones.

LT Debt / Equity

Modeled

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

Payout Ratio

Live

Full reinvestment — no dividend

Share of profit paid out as dividend. Above 100% means the company is funding the dividend from debt or reserves, not profit — a genuine red flag, not just 'high'. 30–60% is the classic sustainable balance; well below that usually just means a growth company reinvesting rather than anything wrong.

Operating Leverage

Modeled

2.65x

Profits amplify — both ways

How much profit jumps for each 1% of extra sales — driven by how much of the cost base is fixed (rent, salaries) versus variable (raw materials). It's a double-edged sword: high fixed-cost businesses (manufacturing, airlines, software) see profit jump disproportionately as sales grow, but the same fixed costs turn a small sales dip into an outsized loss. That's also why these businesses tend to lead in a bull market and get hit hardest first when demand turns down.

Automated DCF valuation

Two-stage discounted cash flow — growth fades to the terminal rate over ten years.

Overvalued

Projected FCF growth5%

Years 1-10, fading toward the terminal rate

Discount rate (WACC)11%

Your required return — higher for leveraged or small caps

Terminal growth3%

Perpetual growth after year 10; keep it near long-run GDP

Intrinsic value per share

£0.00

Market price £3.83 · -100% downside

FCF (TTM): £0M
FCF per share: £0.00
Shares outstanding: 0.28B
PV of years 1-10: £0M
PV of terminal value: £0M

Graham intrinsic value (revised formula)

V = [EPS × (8.5 + 2g) × 4.4] / Y — Benjamin Graham's classic value-investing shortcut

Overvalued

Expected long-term growth (g)5%

Graham's own rule of thumb caps this around 15-20% — very high growth assumptions break the formula

AAA corporate bond yield (Y)5%

Fetching the live rate — using a default for now

EPS (TTM) of £0.01 is taken from the stock's live fundamentals above. The 8.5 base multiple and the 4.4 constant are fixed parts of Graham's original 1962 formula — only g and Y are meant to move with the times.

Intrinsic value per share

£0.13

Market price £3.83 · -96.6% downside

Graham designed this as a quick sanity check, not a precise valuation — it's most useful for stable, profitable, moderate-growth businesses. For high-growth or cyclical names, weigh it alongside the DCF above rather than on its own.

DCF & Graham intrinsic value calculators is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Company financials

EPS (TTM): £0.01
Revenue (TTM): £4.5B
Net margin: 0%
EBITDA margin: 0%
Earnings growth: 5%
Dividend yield: 0%
Payout ratio: 0%
Debt / equity: 0.98x

Figures use live Yahoo Finance data where available; any field Yahoo doesn't report falls back to the DeepScreen model.

USA live news

LIVE

Loading live headlines…

Frequently asked questions about USA

How does DeepScreen analyze Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust?: DeepScreen uses a 13-factor valuation and quality model. The methodology explains the inputs, weighting and limitations; model output is analytical research, not a personalized investment recommendation.
What is USA's P/E ratio?: The latest provider-backed P/E available to DeepScreen is 4.7x. Compare it with the company's own historical range, sustainable earnings growth and close industry peers, using the same reporting period.
How should I assess Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust's profitability?: For Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust, the latest provider-backed snapshot shows net margin is 0.00%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.
How much debt does Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust have?: The current structured company profile does not contain a reliable company-specific debt-to-equity figure. The correct source for that fact is the latest annual report, exchange filing and official company disclosure; DeepScreen should not manufacture a number.
Is USA a buy?: DeepScreen provides research tools rather than a personalized recommendation. A decision should consider business quality, valuation, balance-sheet risk, disclosures, liquidity and your own objectives and risk tolerance.
How does the company make money?: Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust PLC is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by Baillie Gifford & Co Ltd. The fund is managed by Baillie Gifford & Co. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund seeks to invest in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth stocks of companies across diversified market capitalizations. The fund employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust PLC is domiciled in the United Kingdom. This describes the company's disclosed business activity; for exact segment revenue, geography and customer concentration, use the latest annual report.
What is the company's competitive advantage (economic moat)?: Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust's potential moat should be evaluated from observable business economics: scale or cost advantages, network effects, switching costs, brand strength, patents or licences, distribution advantages and barriers to entry. The strongest evidence is a durable combination of pricing power, stable/growing margins and returns on capital over many years; a high ROE or ROCE alone does not prove a moat.
Who are the main competitors, and how does the company differ from them?: DeepScreen's directory-based comparison candidates include SYNC (Syncona), VSVS (Vesuvius), CWR (Ceres Power), HLMA (Halma plc), CYPC (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.). Sector labels and market-cap proximity can use inferred or modeled directory inputs; these candidates are not a verified list of direct competitors; the direct comparison should use products, customers, geography, margins, growth, returns on capital and valuation.
Are its products or services in long-term demand?: The provider classifies Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust in Asset Management. Long-term demand is supported when the underlying industry, customer base and product/service use remain durable over multiple years. For Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust, test that through multi-year revenue and customer trends, retention/repeat purchases where applicable, pricing power, capacity utilisation and the risk of substitution or technological disruption.
Who are its primary customers (individuals, businesses, or government)?: The provider's business profile describes Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust's activities as follows: Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust PLC is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by Baillie Gifford & Co Ltd. The fund is managed by Baillie Gifford & Co. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund seeks to invest in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth stocks of companies across diversified market capitalizations. The fund employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust PLC is domiciled in the United Kingdom. Customer mix itself is not a stock-market ratio, so the primary customers should be confirmed from the company's segment, geographic and customer disclosures.
Is the company consistently profitable, and is its revenue growing year-over-year?: For Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust, the latest provider-backed snapshot shows net margin is 0.00%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.
Does the company generate positive, healthy free cash flow?: Free cash flow should be assessed as operating cash flow minus capital expenditure and then tested for consistency across several periods. A positive single-period result is not enough to establish healthy cash generation.
How high are the company's debt levels compared to its cash holdings and earnings?: Compare gross debt and cash first, then assess net debt relative to EBITDA/EBIT and interest coverage. This separates a highly leveraged balance sheet from a business that carries debt comfortably because cash generation is strong.
How will the company finance its future growth or expansion projects?: The normal financing options are internally generated cash, existing cash reserves, new debt, equity issuance, asset sales or project finance. The exact mix for a future project should be taken from management's announced capital-allocation and funding plans.
What is the company's historical Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)?: Historical ROE and ROCE should be taken from several annual reporting periods. The key question is whether returns remain durable rather than whether one year's ratio is high.
Who are the promoters or top executives running the company, and what is their track record?: The current provider profile lists these senior executives: Mr. Gary Thomas Robinson C.F.A. (Portfolio Manager); Ms. Helen Xiong (Deputy Portfolio Manager). Track record should be assessed through capital-allocation decisions, operating results, governance disclosures and execution against stated targets. For Indian companies, promoter identity and ownership should be checked against the latest exchange shareholding filing.
Is a high percentage of the promoter's stake pledged as collateral for loans?: Promoter pledge is a shareholding-disclosure item, not a normal valuation ratio. For an Indian company, check the latest exchange shareholding pattern and notes for pledged/encumbered promoter shares, and compare the percentage with prior quarters to identify changes. Do not infer pledge levels from debt-to-equity.
Does management have a transparent and honest history of communication with shareholders?: The strongest evidence is consistency between what management says and what later appears in reported results: guidance versus delivery, explanations for misses, treatment of related parties, restatements, capital allocation and disclosure of material risks. A multi-year record is needed; tone alone is not a reliable measure of transparency.
Has the firm ever faced corporate governance issues, legal troubles, or accounting scandals?: This question requires a dated event history. Review regulator orders, exchange notices, audited-report qualifications, court records and reputable reporting, and distinguish allegations or investigations from settlements and established findings. The absence of a warning label on a stock page is not proof that no historical event ever occurred.
Is the current stock valuation (such as the P/E or P/S ratio) reasonable or overpriced?: The latest provider-backed P/E is 4.7x and P/S is not currently available . These are descriptive multiples, not conclusions by themselves. A defensible valuation assessment compares the multiple with sustainable growth, margins, ROE/ROCE, balance-sheet risk, cyclicality and direct peers.
How does the company's valuation compare to its direct industry peers?: A practical peer set for Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust starts with SYNC (Syncona), VSVS (Vesuvius), CWR (Ceres Power), HLMA (Halma plc), CYPC (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.). Compare the same reporting-period P/E, P/S and positive EV/EBITDA only when EBITDA supports a meaningful multiple, then adjust for growth, margin quality, leverage and business mix; a lower positive multiple is not automatically cheaper on an economic-value basis.
What is the margin of safety if market conditions or the economy worsens?: Margin of safety is created by buying with a gap between conservative intrinsic value and market price, then stress-testing the downside case. The relevant stress tests are lower revenue/earnings growth, lower margins, higher funding costs, weaker working capital and a lower terminal valuation. There is no universal fixed percentage that applies to every company.
Does the company pay a reliable dividend, or does it aggressively buy back its own shares?: The current provider-backed dividend yield is not available and payout ratio is 0.00% . Dividend reliability should be checked across several years and against free cash flow, while buyback intensity should be verified from share-count changes, treasury-share activity and cash-flow statements. A one-year yield cannot establish a durable shareholder-distribution policy.

Stock research topics

Stocks, prices & forecasts

Review the scoring factors, underlying data and limitations before comparing companies.

Read the methodology