Skip to content

Company intelligence

Beyond the price.
Inside the business.

Explore this page

DIN — Dine Brands Global, Inc.

NYSE · Healthcare · Large Cap · Mkt cap $350M · Vol 930.2K

$27.83

▼ -2.96% today

Live · market · updated 8:41:10 PM

Day $27.49–$28.47 · 52w $23.23–$39.68

Research Dine Brands Global, Inc. (NYSE: DIN) using available valuation, profitability and leverage data. Check each figure's source and compare reporting periods before drawing conclusions. Missing provider data must not be treated as a reported company fact.

About Dine Brands Global, Inc.

Listed company
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
Exchange and ticker
NYSE stock directory · DIN
Provider sector
Consumer Cyclical
Provider industry
Restaurants

Dine Brands Global, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, franchises, and operates restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates through three segments: Franchise, Company-owned restaurants, and Rental. The company franchises the restaurants operated by Applebee's franchisees, IHOP franchisees, and Fuzzy's franchisees in the United States. It owns, franchises, and operates restaurant concepts, including Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar within the casual dining category; IHOP in the family dining category of the restaurant industry; and Fuzzy's Taco Shop within the fast-casual dining category. In addition, its Applebee's restaurants offer American fare with drinks and local draft beers; IHOP restaurants provided full table services and food and beverages; Fuzzy's Taco Shop offers mexican food, such as tacos, chips and queso, guacamole, and salsa made-from-scratch daily; and a full bar including margaritas, cocktails, and cold draft beer. The company was formerly known as DineEquity, Inc. and changed its name to Dine Brands Global, Inc. in February 2018. Dine Brands Global, Inc. was founded in 1958 and is based in Pasadena, California.

Source: Yahoo Finance — Dine Brands Global, Inc. company profileCompany website

Financial statements and reporting periods

Available ratios are snapshots. This page does not provide a complete historical quarterly-results, profit-and-loss, balance-sheet or shareholding series. Use company filings to verify reporting periods, accounting changes and trends.

🏛️ Member of:Russell 2000

DeepScreen verdict

Hold
61
61

Weighted 13-factor score / 100

Dine Brands Global, Inc. scores 61/100 on the DeepScreen quality-and-value model. Growth is running near 4.4% with a PEG of 1.29, ROCE of 6% and debt/equity at 0.13x. Quality and price roughly offset each other; wait for a better entry or clearer growth.

Strengths

  • + P/S Ratio: 0.39x — modest sales multiple
  • + EV/Revenue: 2.17x — low for an asset-light business
  • + EV/EBITDA: 11.0x — low for asset-light
  • + Debt / Equity: 0.13x — conservative balance sheet

Risks

  • − ROA: 4.6% — low for the sector
  • − ROCE: 6.0% — below cost of capital risk
  • − Payout Ratio: 174% — red flag — paying out more than it earns
  • − P/E Ratio (TTM): 44.9x — expensive — priced for high growth

Vision & Utility score and Secret Tips badges is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Target price, trim level & stop-loss is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Why this score?

The 61/100 score is a weighted average of 13 fundamental factors. This panel shows which factor scores contribute most to the current model result.

Model explanation

Highest-scoring factors

P/S Ratio100/100 · 0.7× weight

Modest sales multiple. Weighted contribution: 5.5 points.

EV/Revenue100/100 · 0.8× weight

Low for an asset-light business. Weighted contribution: 6.3 points.

EV/EBITDA100/100 · 1.2× weight

Low for asset-light. Weighted contribution: 9.4 points.

Debt / Equity100/100 · 1.1× weight

Conservative balance sheet. Weighted contribution: 8.6 points.

Lowest-scoring factors

ROCE5/100 · 1.6× weight

Below cost of capital risk. Weighted contribution: 0.6 points.

ROA5/100 · 0.9× weight

Low for the sector. Weighted contribution: 0.4 points.

Payout Ratio10/100 · 0.5× weight

Red flag — paying out more than it earns. Weighted contribution: 0.4 points.

P/E Ratio (TTM)35/100 · 1.0× weight

Expensive — priced for high growth. Weighted contribution: 2.7 points.

Factor scores are model outputs, not forecasts. A high or low factor score describes how that metric is treated by the DeepScreen rules; review the underlying value and its source before drawing a broader conclusion.

Live fundamentals snapshot

Current operating, capital-efficiency and cash-flow metrics using the latest available provider data.

Live where available
Updated 8:41:10 PM
Revenue growthLive
4.4%

Provider-reported period-over-period growth

Earnings growthLive
-60.5%

Provider-reported period-over-period growth

ROEModeled
19.7%

Return on equity

ROCEModeled
6.0%

Return on capital employed

Net marginLive
0.8%

Net income as a share of revenue

D/EModeled
0.1x

Debt relative to shareholder equity

Free cash flowLive
$27.1M

49% of operating cash flow

Cash vs debtLive
$1.59B net debt

Cash $97.5M · Debt $1.69B

Earnings growth is 64.9 percentage points below revenue growth in the latest provider snapshot.

Provider periods can differ by field. Growth figures are presented as reported by the upstream provider; they are not reconstructed from an expensive historical time series.

Current research alerts

Threshold-based research checks from the latest available fundamentals. These are on-page signals, not push notifications or predictions.

Payout ratio exceeds 100%

The model sees a 174% payout ratio. Check dividend funding against earnings and free cash flow.

High P/E with lower reported growth

P/E is 44.9x versus growth of 4.4%. Compare the multiple with direct peers and sustainable growth assumptions.

Signals are intended to highlight questions for research, not replace company filings or independent review.

Closest peer competitors

Industry match: Restaurants. Peers use the same regional market universe, same sector, provider-reported industry where available, and market-cap proximity.

Loading

Peer fundamentals are still loading. The comparison will populate automatically when comparable company data arrives.

DeepScreen Secret Tips, traps & X-Ray analysis is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

God's Eye forensics

Accounting quality and solvency screens. Anything that can't be computed from available filings data is left blank rather than estimated.

Piotroski F-Score

7/8

7

7 of 8 financial-health checks passed (1 checks need data this provider doesn't publish).

Altman Z-Score

Insufficient data

—

Needs total assets, operating profit and debt — not published for this listing yet.

Beneish (earnings quality)

Low distortion risk

8.86

Accrual-quality check only: operating cash flow is 886% of reported net profit. Below 80% means profits aren't fully backed by cash.

Scores are free. The criteria-by-criteria breakdown — exactly which checks this company failed — is part of DeepScreen Pro.

Fundamental breakdown — core ratios are free · EV/Revenue, PEG, EV/EBITDA and LT D/E are Pro-only live via Yahoo Finance, updated 8:41:10 PM

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Live

44.9x

Expensive — priced for high growth

Price divided by earnings per share: how much you pay today for ₹1/$1 of annual profit. Only compare within the same industry.

PEG Ratio

Live

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

P/S Ratio

Live

0.39x

Modest sales multiple

Price relative to revenue. Sales are much harder to accounting-fudge than earnings, so this is a trustworthy number — and it's often the only usable multiple for loss-making or early-stage companies where P/E doesn't exist. But revenue without margin means nothing on its own: always read it alongside net margin.

P/B Ratio

Modeled

8.84x

Typical for the sector

Price versus net asset value. Asset-light businesses like this one carry most of their value in people and IP, not machinery or property, so P/B runs structurally high here — not a red flag by itself. Weigh P/E and ROE more heavily instead.

EV/Revenue

Live

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

EV/EBITDA

Live

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

ROE

Modeled

19.7%

Healthy

Return on shareholder equity. High ROE is great — unless it is manufactured by heavy debt, so always read it next to ROA and D/E: high ROE with low ROA is the classic debt-trap pattern.

ROA

Live

4.6%

Low for the sector

Net Income / Total Assets — how efficiently the whole business converts its asset base into profit. Computed as ROE / (1 + D/E) when live data is unavailable. Only compare within the same industry: asset-light businesses (IT, services) will always show a structurally higher ROA than asset-heavy ones (steel, airlines, utilities) simply because they carry far less on the balance sheet to begin with, not because they're better run.

ROCE

Modeled

6.0%

Below cost of capital risk

Return on all capital employed (equity plus debt). The cleanest quality signal because debt cannot flatter it.

Debt / Equity

Modeled

0.13x

Conservative balance sheet

Total liabilities divided by shareholders' equity — the broadest leverage measure. High leverage boosts ROE in good years and destroys it in bad ones.

LT Debt / Equity

Modeled

Pro

Advanced ratio · DeepScreen Pro

Pro

Payout Ratio

Live

174%

Red flag — paying out more than it earns

Share of profit paid out as dividend. Above 100% means the company is funding the dividend from debt or reserves, not profit — a genuine red flag, not just 'high'. 30–60% is the classic sustainable balance; well below that usually just means a growth company reinvesting rather than anything wrong.

Operating Leverage

Modeled

25.84x

Profits amplify — both ways

How much profit jumps for each 1% of extra sales — driven by how much of the cost base is fixed (rent, salaries) versus variable (raw materials). It's a double-edged sword: high fixed-cost businesses (manufacturing, airlines, software) see profit jump disproportionately as sales grow, but the same fixed costs turn a small sales dip into an outsized loss. That's also why these businesses tend to lead in a bull market and get hit hardest first when demand turns down.

DCF & Graham intrinsic value calculators is a DeepScreen Pro feature

Unlock from ₹50/week · ₹175/month · ₹1800/year

Unlock Pro

Company financials

EPS (TTM)
$0.62
Revenue (TTM)
$900M
Net margin
0.76%
EBITDA margin
19.64%
Earnings growth
4.4%
Dividend yield
0.03%
Payout ratio
174.19%
Debt / equity
0.13x

Figures use live Yahoo Finance data where available; any field Yahoo doesn't report falls back to the DeepScreen model.

DIN live news

LIVE

Loading live headlines…

Frequently asked questions about DIN

How does DeepScreen analyze Dine Brands Global, Inc.?
DeepScreen uses a 13-factor valuation and quality model. The methodology explains the inputs, weighting and limitations; model output is analytical research, not a personalized investment recommendation.
What is DIN's P/E ratio?
The latest provider-backed P/E available to DeepScreen is 44.9x. Compare it with the company's own historical range, sustainable earnings growth and close industry peers, using the same reporting period.
How should I assess Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s profitability?
For Dine Brands Global, Inc., the latest provider-backed snapshot shows the latest growth measure is 4.40%, net margin is 0.76%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.
How much debt does Dine Brands Global, Inc. have?
The current structured company profile does not contain a reliable company-specific debt-to-equity figure. The correct source for that fact is the latest annual report, exchange filing and official company disclosure; DeepScreen should not manufacture a number.
Is DIN a buy?
DeepScreen provides research tools rather than a personalized recommendation. A decision should consider business quality, valuation, balance-sheet risk, disclosures, liquidity and your own objectives and risk tolerance.
How does the company make money?
Dine Brands Global, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, franchises, and operates restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates through three segments: Franchise, Company-owned restaurants, and Rental. The company franchises the restaurants operated by Applebee's franchisees, IHOP franchisees, and Fuzzy's franchisees in the United States. It owns, franchises, and operates restaurant concepts, including Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar within the casual dining category; IHOP in the family dining category of the restaurant industry; and Fuzzy's Taco Shop within the fast-casual dining category. In addition, its Applebee's restaurants offer American fare with drinks and local draft beers; IHOP restaurants provided full table services and food and beverages; Fuzzy's Taco Shop offers mexican food, such as tacos, chips and queso, guacamole, and salsa made-from-scratch daily; and a full bar including margaritas, cocktails, and cold draft beer. The company was formerly known as DineEquity, Inc. and changed its name to Dine Brands Global, Inc. in February 2018. Dine Brands Global, Inc. was founded in 1958 and is based in Pasadena, California. This describes the company's disclosed business activity; for exact segment revenue, geography and customer concentration, use the latest annual report.
What is the company's competitive advantage (economic moat)?
Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s potential moat should be evaluated from observable business economics: scale or cost advantages, network effects, switching costs, brand strength, patents or licences, distribution advantages and barriers to entry. The strongest evidence is a durable combination of pricing power, stable/growing margins and returns on capital over many years; a high ROE or ROCE alone does not prove a moat.
Who are the main competitors, and how does the company differ from them?
DeepScreen's directory-based comparison candidates include MAC (Macerich Company (The)), THRM (Gentherm Inc), ROG (Rogers Corporation), SBRA (Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.), TWIN (Twin Disc, Incorporated). Sector labels and market-cap proximity can use inferred or modeled directory inputs; these candidates are not a verified list of direct competitors; the direct comparison should use products, customers, geography, margins, growth, returns on capital and valuation.
Are its products or services in long-term demand?
The provider classifies Dine Brands Global, Inc. in Restaurants. Long-term demand is supported when the underlying industry, customer base and product/service use remain durable over multiple years. For Dine Brands Global, Inc., test that through multi-year revenue and customer trends, retention/repeat purchases where applicable, pricing power, capacity utilisation and the risk of substitution or technological disruption.
Who are its primary customers (individuals, businesses, or government)?
The provider's business profile describes Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s activities as follows: Dine Brands Global, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, franchises, and operates restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates through three segments: Franchise, Company-owned restaurants, and Rental. The company franchises the restaurants operated by Applebee's franchisees, IHOP franchisees, and Fuzzy's franchisees in the United States. It owns, franchises, and operates restaurant concepts, including Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar within the casual dining category; IHOP in the family dining category of the restaurant industry; and Fuzzy's Taco Shop within the fast-casual dining category. In addition, its Applebee's restaurants offer American fare with drinks and local draft beers; IHOP restaurants provided full table services and food and beverages; Fuzzy's Taco Shop offers mexican food, such as tacos, chips and queso, guacamole, and salsa made-from-scratch daily; and a full bar including margaritas, cocktails, and cold draft beer. The company was formerly known as DineEquity, Inc. and changed its name to Dine Brands Global, Inc. in February 2018. Dine Brands Global, Inc. was founded in 1958 and is based in Pasadena, California. Customer mix itself is not a stock-market ratio, so the primary customers should be confirmed from the company's segment, geographic and customer disclosures.
Is the company consistently profitable, and is its revenue growing year-over-year?
For Dine Brands Global, Inc., the latest provider-backed snapshot shows the latest growth measure is 4.40%, net margin is 0.76%. Consistent profitability and healthy year-over-year growth should be confirmed over several reporting periods, with earnings reconciled to operating cash flow and one-off items removed from the analysis.
Does the company generate positive, healthy free cash flow?
The latest provider snapshot reports free cash flow of approximately $27.12M, with operating cash flow of about $55.80M. Whether that cash flow is healthy depends on persistence, conversion of profit to cash, capital expenditure needs and working-capital movements; inspect multiple periods rather than one TTM figure.
How high are the company's debt levels compared to its cash holdings and earnings?
The current snapshot shows a partial leverage picture, debt of roughly $1.69B, cash of roughly $97.50M, implying net debt of about $1.59B. The full debt burden should be compared with EBITDA/EBIT, interest expense, maturities and recurring free cash flow.
How will the company finance its future growth or expansion projects?
Dine Brands Global, Inc. currently has reported cash of about $97.50M and free cash flow of about $27.12M. Those internal resources can contribute to expansion, while additional funding can come from operating cash flow, debt, equity issuance, asset sales or project finance. The exact funding mix for a specific project must come from management's disclosed plans.
What is the company's historical Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)?
Historical ROE and ROCE should be taken from several annual reporting periods. The key question is whether returns remain durable rather than whether one year's ratio is high.
Who are the promoters or top executives running the company, and what is their track record?
The current provider profile lists these senior executives: Mr. John W. Peyton (CEO, Applebee's President & Director); Mr. Vance Yuwen Chang (Chief Financial Officer); Ms. Christine K. Son (Senior VP of Legal, General Counsel & Secretary); Mr. Lawrence Y. Kim (Chief Commercial Officer & President of IHOP Business Unit); Mr. Joseph F. Camperlingo (Senior VP & Chief Accounting Officer). Track record should be assessed through capital-allocation decisions, operating results, governance disclosures and execution against stated targets. For Indian companies, promoter identity and ownership should be checked against the latest exchange shareholding filing.
Is a high percentage of the promoter's stake pledged as collateral for loans?
Promoter pledge is a shareholding-disclosure item, not a normal valuation ratio. For an Indian company, check the latest exchange shareholding pattern and notes for pledged/encumbered promoter shares, and compare the percentage with prior quarters to identify changes. Do not infer pledge levels from debt-to-equity.
Does management have a transparent and honest history of communication with shareholders?
The strongest evidence is consistency between what management says and what later appears in reported results: guidance versus delivery, explanations for misses, treatment of related parties, restatements, capital allocation and disclosure of material risks. A multi-year record is needed; tone alone is not a reliable measure of transparency.
Has the firm ever faced corporate governance issues, legal troubles, or accounting scandals?
This question requires a dated event history. Review regulator orders, exchange notices, audited-report qualifications, court records and reputable reporting, and distinguish allegations or investigations from settlements and established findings. The absence of a warning label on a stock page is not proof that no historical event ever occurred.
Is the current stock valuation (such as the P/E or P/S ratio) reasonable or overpriced?
The latest provider-backed P/E is 44.9x and P/S is 0.39x . These are descriptive multiples, not conclusions by themselves. A defensible valuation assessment compares the multiple with sustainable growth, margins, ROE/ROCE, balance-sheet risk, cyclicality and direct peers.
How does the company's valuation compare to its direct industry peers?
A practical peer set for Dine Brands Global, Inc. starts with MAC (Macerich Company (The)), THRM (Gentherm Inc), ROG (Rogers Corporation), SBRA (Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.), TWIN (Twin Disc, Incorporated). Compare the same reporting-period P/E, P/S and positive EV/EBITDA only when EBITDA supports a meaningful multiple, then adjust for growth, margin quality, leverage and business mix; a lower positive multiple is not automatically cheaper on an economic-value basis.
What is the margin of safety if market conditions or the economy worsens?
Margin of safety is created by buying with a gap between conservative intrinsic value and market price, then stress-testing the downside case. The relevant stress tests are lower revenue/earnings growth, lower margins, higher funding costs, weaker working capital and a lower terminal valuation. There is no universal fixed percentage that applies to every company.
Does the company pay a reliable dividend, or does it aggressively buy back its own shares?
The latest provider-backed dividend yield is 0.0% and payout ratio is 174.19% . Dividend reliability should be checked across several years and against free cash flow, while buyback intensity should be verified from share-count changes, treasury-share activity and cash-flow statements. A one-year yield cannot establish a durable shareholder-distribution policy.

Stock research topics

Stocks, prices & forecasts

Review the scoring factors, underlying data and limitations before comparing companies.

Read the methodology